In accordance to the Countrywide Organiser of the NPP, Sammy Awuku, Ghanaians should address the $10 billion assure with contempt.
He said the previous president will use this kind of an avenue really should he return to energy to enrich himself.
Addressing the media on Thursday, August 13, Sammi Awuku mentioned Mr Mahama will use the chance to enrich himself since the expense of the initiatives or infrastructure will be inflated, as has been finished with prior tasks in the course of his tenure in place of work.
“Candidate Mahama promises that he will inject US$10 billion into infrastructure and use that to build positions. He mentioned this in a knee-jerk response to the Akufo-Addo programme to support Ghana’s economy recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. It seems Mr Mahama is quite fond of determine 10 billion. Ghanaians should dismiss this as a whole pipe down. In 2013, operating with his good pal, Roland Aganbri amidst the good fanfare, Mr Mahama went to reduce the sod for the US$10 billion Hope Metropolis project promising countless numbers of employment in the system not figuring out he had not even acquired the land for the job,” Sammi Awuku mentioned.
In accordance to him, even nevertheless Mahama promises the US$10 billion infrastructure increase will generate employment for the youth, absolutely nothing of the type will transpire, but fairly, a monetary scandal is what will be still left for Ghanaians.
He cautioned Ghanaians to be exceptionally thorough with these claims from John Mahama, as he does not have any interest in the result of any projects and how it will benefit Ghanaians.
“When he also says he is heading to establish assignments, Ghanaians should be exceptionally watchful and be anxious simply because of the inflated charge of these initiatives. He is not intrigued in the consequence of the undertaking and the impression it will have on Ghanaians neither is he intrigued in worth for funds. So, when he says he is likely to invest billions in infrastructure, Ghanaians must address it not as a assure but as a risk, not as an infrastructural answer but a fiscal scandal. It will have to not draw you closer in the direction of him but borrow his legs and operate absent with it,” he concluded.
