Home Politics View: Electoral Commission’s new software program lacks integrity: Ghana’s democracy at crossroads...

View: Electoral Commission’s new software program lacks integrity: Ghana’s democracy at crossroads [ARTICLE]


Of system in any new program installation from an present method to a new process, present data can very easily be migrated but just one of the weird reasons given by the Electoral Commission (EC) was that the info could not be migrated so a new voters’ registration workout was needed. This arrived with its very own political ramifications and the relaxation as they say is heritage.

In software adjust management, there is sure associated pre-determined operational and devices risk universe that have pre-determined mitigating aspects. This involves write-up-implementation functions that may perhaps conclusion up at periods getting parallel operates to exam the integrity of the new installation in opposition to known success in the previous system. Of training course depending on the issues, a single can pick out to have a turnkey procedure of completely shutting down the aged process for the new in smaller a lot less delicate initiatives.

The challenges in facts migration primarily involve incomplete or truncated information transfer, duplication of info transfer for which a knowledge reconciliation can solve. This seriously has absolutely nothing to do with the real new program but the migration architecture that may well have been applied and can be corrected. Banks for that make a difference rarely do these application modifications obtaining to the finish of the year when they have to have to prepare their financials. In transforming software nearly anything is doable some which are not able to be envisaged until finally the undertaking commences. This wants time dependent on the scale of the venture to solve. It is in this wisdom that it is sensible that 6 months into an election, variations need to not be built to the Electoral Commission’s technique but the EC task crew decided to go in opposition to this cardinal rule.

Immediately after the registration and the exhibition of the provisional register, the pursuing amongst other individuals have been documented:

  • Duplicated voter identification card numbers with two voters possessing the same amount.
  • Deleted names which are different from missing names.
  • Names without having images

The higher than, if not human errors are a supply of issue because it hinges on the integrity of the new computer software that is to be applied in the 2020 elections in December. Deleted names can be related with both equally human and computer software faults but duplicated quantities and names with out pics are a lot more of software program than human error and this really should not be taken flippantly. The images ended up captured less than the voter’s title and saved and cards printed. If the sign up has the person’s name but no picture, this is not a human mistake. If the two persons have the exact card variety, this is not a human error.

Software program patches can constantly be published to appropriate application faults but in an election, these glitches have much-achieving outcomes of impacting the Constitutional and human rights of self-perseverance by the citizenry. How do we know that an error would not happen on the voting working day exactly where people’s votes can be doubled or some deleted? How do we know that the process are not able to decrease one particular party’s vote for the other? At this issue in which is the redress system? The hurt would have been brought on and benefits will be declared since there are timelines to the election system.

The EC created us feel that the old sign up experienced knowledge integrity challenges as a final result of becoming more than-bloated, having foreigners, ghost names, and so on but this was not linked to the integrity of the software program. Now the new one particular has the two knowledge and software package integrity issues which in my belief is extra devastating. As of now, no one particular is conversing about the biometrics since that facet was largely not tested all through the exhibition workout. What transpires if A’s fingerprint has been wrongly matched to that of B? At which point is this going to be corrected, except if the EC has an ultimate program of working with the guide sign-up on voting working day. To put it in layman terms, a typist who would make an error on a document can retype or at greatest say sorry but what about a driver of a automobile who can make an mistake. You will be useless and what use is the sorry.

I assume the EC’s final work should be qualified by the Facts Protection Fee to assure us, knowledge topics, that our information and facts has not been compromised particularly biometrics. Try to remember that entry to this databases has in the past with out our consent been built out there to private institutions this kind of as banks for a payment to verify our id which has its own lawful implications.

It will be intriguing to know how the EC can get out of this self-inflicted program integrity difficulties relating to the compilation of new voters sign-up without having a devastating impact on the steady democracy of the country. With this, it can be stated that Ghana’s democracy is at crossroads.

The author Dr. Kofi Anokye Owusu-Darko, retains an EMBA (IT Administration) and an LLM (IT & Telecommunication)

The sights and opinions expressed herein are the non-public sights of the contributors and do not replicate the sights of the organization Pulse.

Resource website link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here